tgroenwals shared this post · Apr 21
Patrick Giwa, PhD

Most businesses do not have an AI idea problem.

They have an execution problem.

I once stepped into a major AI programme with money behind it, internal attention, and plenty of confidence around it.

What it did not have was a clearly defined product.

There was already momentum.
Senior interest.
Big expectations.
Plenty of talking.

But when you stripped it back, the basics were missing.

No clear definition of the problem.
No shared understanding of the workflow.
No real agreement on what needed to be built first.

This is where many teams lose time.

They start protecting themselves with meetings.
They ask for more alignment.
They make the deck better instead of making the work clearer.

Meanwhile, the pressure grows.

Stakeholders want answers.
Expectations harden.
Confidence becomes performance.

In my case, I went back to first principles.

What is the real problem?
Where is the workflow breakdown?
Who is feeling the pain?
What would be useful now, not six months from now?

Then we started moving.

We made decisions before everything felt neat.
We got closer to users.
We tested what mattered.
We shipped in smaller parts.
We learned quickly and adjusted.

3 months later, we had a version 1

It eventually went on to be used by 10 Fortune 500 brands.

The lesson was simple.

AI does not reward the team with the most excitement.

It rewards the team that can turn ambiguity into execution.

That usually looks like this:

  1. Define the workflow before you talk about the tool
  • If you cannot explain where the work breaks,
  • you are not ready to design the AI layer.
  1. Make decisions while the picture is still incomplete
  • Waiting for total certainty usually means delay disguised as rigour.
  1. Stay close to the people doing the work
  • Real use cases come from operational friction,
  • not brainstorm theatre.
  1. Deliver proof early
  • A small working improvement beats a large future promise.
  1. Keep momentum visible
  • When people can see movement, trust grows.

If you lead AI work, this is important for you.

The advantage does not go to the team with the biggest ambition.

It goes to the team that can make AI useful in real work.

🚨
I’m running a free masterclass on how to create AI agents for real workflows.

If you want AI to do more than produce demos and disconnected pilots, this will help you think more clearly about where agents fit, what they should do, and how to apply them to actual business work.

Register here - https://lnkd.in/eGtFJ26H
🚨

â™» Reshare to help someone turn AI into execution
âž• Follow Patrick Giwa, PhD for more like this

313
Ade Shokoya I see this often in my work. A lot of it seems to come down to people knowing they need to do something with AI, but not knowing where to start. Then FOMO/FOBLB kicks in so they just dive in. That isn't necessarily a bad move during times of uncertainty. But it has to be strategically paired with an "inspect and adapt" approach to find what actually works for the business. Apr 20 1 like
Madan Upadhyay Patrick Giwa, PhD
This lands well-execution is where most AI efforts quietly fail.

One addition: the real bottleneck is often decision latency, not ideas. Teams wait for certainty and call it rigor.

How do you push teams to make faster calls without compromising quality?
Apr 20 2 likes