tgroenwals shared this post · Apr 21
Clare Kitching

Everyone talks about AI models.
Very few talk about AI systems.

When you look under the hood of most AI today, you rarely find just a large language model.

You find layers.
Context. Memory. Retrieval. Tools. Autonomy.

This diagram shows the progression.

▶️ Large Language Models (LLMs) are the foundation.
They are massive neural networks trained to understand and generate human language.
They take an input and produce a response based on patterns learned during training.
Powerful, but limited to what they already know.

▶️ RAG (Retrieval Augmented Generation) connects an LLM to external information sources like documents or databases.
Before answering, the system retrieves relevant content and uses it to respond.
This reduces errors and keeps answers up to date, but introduces real engineering work around embeddings, vector search, and document design.

▶️ AI Agents go a step further.
They are systems that can take actions on your behalf to achieve a task.
They plan steps, call tools, execute actions, and track state over time.
This is no longer just about answering questions. It is about doing work.

▶️ Agentic AI systems push autonomy even further.
They coordinate multiple agents, reason over longer horizons, manage memory, and pursue goals with limited human input.
Here the challenge shifts from building capability to orchestrating behaviour.

Each layer demands more than better technology.
It demands better decisions.
→ Moving from LLMs to RAG means investing in data quality and retrieval design.
→ Moving from RAG to Agents means trusting systems to act.
→ Moving to Agentic AI means accepting shared responsibility between humans and machines.

As organisations move up the stack they need to change how they govern, monitor, and own these systems.

Intelligence is the easy part.
Designing for trust is the real work.

Which layer do you think your organisation is actually ready for?

♻️ Repost to help someone understand AI systems.
🔔 Follow Clare Kitching for insights on unlocking value with data & AI.

1.5K
Paulo Segala The biggest gap isn't intelligence, it's decision architecture.

Most organizations still evaluate AI readiness based on capability: model performance, data quality, retrieval, and tooling.

But once the system starts influencing real work, the real question shifts to:
Who owns the decision?
Who steps in when the system drifts?
What escalation path is available when speed and control clash?

That’s why moving from LLMs to agents isn't just a technological upgrade. It’s a change in operational authority.

If governance, decision rights, and intervention boundaries aren’t redesigned with that shift, autonomy will outpace accountability.
Apr 20 1 like
Antônio Marberger Exceptional breakdown, Clare. The industry is currently obsessed with 'Intelligence' (the LLM), but the real enterprise value lies in the Orchestration. At ai.fainow.com, we see that moving up this stack—from RAG to Agentic systems—fails if the underlying Organization of data is weak. You can't have reliable 'Autonomy' without a rock-solid Operation. Designing for trust, as you mentioned, is effectively designing for predictability. Most organizations want Agents, but they haven't yet mastered the Capture and data quality required for RAG. We have to build the foundation before we can trust the agent to act. Apr 20 1 like