๐๐ ๐ฒ๐จ๐ฎ๐ซ ๐๐๐ญ๐ ๐ฌ๐ญ๐ซ๐๐ญ๐๐ ๐ฒ ๐ฌ๐ญ๐๐ซ๐ญ๐ฌ ๐ฐ๐ข๐ญ๐ก "๐ฐ๐ก๐ข๐๐ก ๐ญ๐จ๐จ๐ฅ," ๐ข๐ญ'๐ฌ ๐๐ฅ๐ซ๐๐๐๐ฒ ๐ฐ๐ซ๐จ๐ง๐ .
It should start with which problem.
Mesh, Fabric, and Lakehouse get pitched like rival platforms. They're not. They answer three completely different questions.
Use this to decide ๐
๐๐ฌ ๐ฒ๐จ๐ฎ๐ซ ๐ฉ๐ซ๐จ๐๐ฅ๐๐ฆ ๐ฉ๐๐จ๐ฉ๐ฅ๐? โ ๐๐๐ญ๐ ๐๐๐ฌ๐ก
โ Central data team is the bottleneck
โ Domains can't move fast enough
โ Need: domain ownership, data-as-product, federated governance, SLA contracts
๐๐ฌ ๐ฒ๐จ๐ฎ๐ซ ๐ฉ๐ซ๐จ๐๐ฅ๐๐ฆ ๐ข๐ง๐ญ๐๐ ๐ซ๐๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง? โ ๐๐๐ญ๐ ๐
๐๐๐ซ๐ข๐
โ Data scattered across cloud, SaaS, on-prem
โ Manual lineage, policy gaps, slow discovery
โ Need: active metadata, knowledge graph, virtualization, AI/ML augmentation, real-time discovery
๐๐ฌ ๐ฒ๐จ๐ฎ๐ซ ๐ฉ๐ซ๐จ๐๐ฅ๐๐ฆ ๐ฌ๐ญ๐จ๐ซ๐๐ ๐? โ ๐๐๐ญ๐ ๐๐๐ค๐๐ก๐จ๐ฎ๐ฌ๐
โ Lake too messy, warehouse too rigid
โ Duplicating data for BI vs ML
โ Need: ACID transactions, Delta/Iceberg/Hudi, BI + ML on one copy, streaming + batch unified
๐๐ก๐ ๐ฌ๐ก๐ข๐๐ญ: Stop asking "which architecture?" Start asking "which bottleneck?"
The right answer often involves all three, but in the right order.
What's your biggest data bottleneck right now?
Follow Sumit Gupta for more such insights!!