tgroenwals shared this post · 2h ago
Dov Shenkman

From PMO to TMO to VMO

From PMO to TMO to VMO

PMO
-Focus: Deliver Projects
-On time
-On budget
-Within scope
-Milestone driven
-Measures execution

TMO
-Focus: Drive Transformation
-Enable adoption
-Manage organizational change
-Build new capabilities
-Align stakeholders
-Measures transformation readiness

VMO
-Focus: Realize Value
-Define value upfront
-Track value realization
-Govern investment decisions
-Align strategy to execution
-Measure customer value and business value

The Evolution
PMO: Did we deliver the project?
⬇️
TMO: Did the organization adopt the change?
⬇️
VMO: Did we create the value we promised?

The Future of Enterprise Governance

Manage Projects → Manage Change → Manage Value

Start your Value Centric Transformation and share your story!

For more information visit: www.valuecentricibp.com

To order on Amazon: https://a.co/d/04zq5gcK

Sharad Suri Strong evolution, Dov. Delivering a project on time and on budget matters, but execution alone does not guarantee impact. The real test is whether the change is adopted, improves how the organization operates, and ultimately creates the value that justified the investment in the first place. Moving from managing projects to managing value is an important shift in leadership thinking.
Sharad Suri Dov Shenkman Exactly, Dov. That shift from measuring completion to measuring realized value is key. An initiative can be delivered exactly as planned, but if it is not adopted or does not produce a measurable customer or business outcome, successful execution alone is not enough. Appreciate you expanding on this.
Youssif Fawaz I think we sometimes overcomplicate things by inventing new acronyms every few years. PMO, TMO, VMO, IMO... they all sound like standardized disciplines, but in reality they are often just labels. There is no universally accepted operating model that dictates exactly how these offices should be structured, what they should own, or how they should function. Every organization defines them differently based on its maturity, leadership preferences, culture, and business needs.
What really matters is not whether you call it a PMO, TMO, or VMO. What matters is having clear governance, defined decision rights, accountability, capable people, and measurable outcomes. I have seen PMOs acting like TMOs, TMOs acting like strategy offices, and VMOs functioning as portfolio offices. The title on the door rarely reflects the actual responsibilities.
So while these frameworks are useful for discussion, we should avoid presenting them as universal standards. There is no single "by-the-book" model. The operating model should always be designed to serve the organization, not to fit the latest acronym.
Youssif Fawaz Dov Shenkman
From that perspective, you are absolutely right!