▶️ The AI ROI Fallacy: Unmeasured Infrastructure in Turnaround Assets
David's Bridal recently claimed asking for AI ROI is "the wrong question" because AI is now "infrastructure."
For a legacy retail brand fresh out of multiple bankruptcies, that should set off alarms for their board and private equity sponsors.
Infrastructure still consumes capital. Capital has a cost. Warehouses, ERP upgrades, data platforms, and governance programs all require a business case. AI doesn't get a pass.
CION Investments didn't rescue a distressed retail asset so management could relabel unmeasured AI spend as "infrastructure."
This is the same logic inflating the AI CapEx bubble across the tech sector: spend first, narrate later, then act offended when someone asks where the return shows up.
AI investments need capital discipline, reliability controls, data governance, adoption architecture, EBITDA impact, and measurable value realization.
Private equity investors and boards can't afford to accept "it's infrastructure" as an excuse for unmeasured capital allocation.
Link to the full article below: The AI ROI Fallacy: Unmeasured Infrastructure in Turnaround Assets
#PrivateEquity #AIGovernance #CapitalEfficiency #TurnaroundStrategy #EnterpriseAI #RetailStrategy #CorporateGovernance
c: 🏷 Ricardo Belmar, Walter Holbrook, Neil Saunders, Javier E. David, Amanda Chin, Barbara Kahn, Kim Bhasin