richeddy shared this post · 2h ago
Brad Schoenfeld

How does muscle growth actually progress over time?

Our new systematic review and meta-analysis, posted as a preprint (DOI:10.51224/SportRxiv.910), pooled 3,237 observations from 480 studies to model the trajectory of resistance training-induced muscle growth.

As expected, muscle growth follows a curvilinear trajectory.

Gains occur relatively rapidly during the early stages of training and then progressively slow as training continues. At 10 weeks, the model estimated an average increase in muscle size of approximately 7%. This increased to ~7.5% at 12 weeks, ~8.9% at 20 weeks, ~10.5% at 36 weeks, and ~12.6% at 78 weeks.

In other words, hypertrophy displays diminishing returns—but diminishing returns do not mean no returns. Gains continue to accumulate; they simply become progressively smaller over time.

Importantly, there was substantial variability around these averages. At 10 weeks, for example, the 95% prediction interval ranged from approximately −7% to +22%, highlighting just how much hypertrophic responses can differ across studies and individuals. Moreover, most of the included studies were relatively short in duration, limiting our ability to draw conclusions about the rate of hypertrophy over longer training periods.

Perhaps more importantly, research studies are generally designed to determine group-level effects rather than to optimize muscle development for each individual. Thus, these findings provide a useful framework for understanding the general trajectory of hypertrophy over time, but should not be interpreted as defining the limits of what a person can achieve with a customized, well-designed training program.

Take-home: Muscle growth tends to occur most rapidly during the early stages of resistance training, with the rate of gain progressively slowing as training exposure accumulates. However, diminishing returns do not mean an end to progress, and early rates of growth should not be extrapolated linearly over the long term.

Shout out to Brandon Roberts for spearheading the project 💪🏽

337 26 72
Benjamin Levinson 50 years from now my expectation is that we are going to be talking much more about individual variability and genetic potential than we have up to this point. The research looking at nonresponders often shows that much greater stimulus in some capacity will provide at least some results.

It will be really nice if we get to a point where a generic starter routine can be derived, such that the response to the routine can provide insight into responsivity to training and help people know how to change the stimulus productively over time.
Yesterday
Jose Vicar This is why after grinding early levels it’s important to do quests with rewards that increase base stats! Yesterday