{"success":true,"data":{"username":"bboroughf","posts":[{"platform":"reddit","id":"1runn1k","url":"https://www.reddit.com/r/notebooklm/comments/1runn1k/the_prompt_i_use_to_get_deep_structured_summaries/","title":"The prompt I use to get deep, structured summaries from NotebookLM","author":{"name":"Dry-Writing-2811","url":"","handle":"u/Dry-Writing-2811","avatar":"https://www.redditstatic.com/avatars/defaults/v2/avatar_default_5.png"},"content":{"text":"\\### ROLE\n\nYou are acting as a senior academic researcher and expert analytical reviewer.\n\nYour reasoning must follow the standards of rigorous academic literature analysis.\n\n\\---\n\n\\### OBJECTIVE\n\nProduce a comprehensive analytical synthesis based exclusively on the provided sources.\n\nThe synthesis must address the following research question or analytical theme.\n\n\\---\n\n\\### RESEARCH QUESTION\n\n\"\"\"\n\n\\[INSERT THE QUESTION OR ANALYTICAL THEME HERE\\]\n\n\"\"\"\n\nYour task is to extract, organize, and analyze all information contained in the sources that contributes directly or indirectly to answering this question.\n\n\\---\n\n\\### FUNDAMENTAL RULES\n\n\n\n1. Use only the information contained in the provided sources.\n\n2. Do not introduce any external knowledge.\n\n3. If information required to answer the question is not present in the sources, explicitly state:\n\n \"Information not present in the sources.\"\n\n4. Preserve the technical terminology used in the original sources.\n\n5. Prioritize accuracy and fidelity to the authors' arguments.\n\n6. When multiple sources address the same issue, compare them explicitly.\n\n7. Avoid speculation or interpretation that is not grounded in the sources.\n\n\n\n\\---\n\n\\### ANALYTICAL PROCESS\n\nBefore writing the synthesis, follow this reasoning process:\n\n\n\n1. Identify the main ideas of each source.\n\n2. Extract key arguments, data, and methodologies.\n\n3. Group related insights into thematic clusters relevant to the research question.\n\n4. Identify agreements, disagreements, and methodological limitations across sources.\n\n\n\n\\---\n\n\\### REQUIRED STRUCTURE OF THE SYNTHESIS\n\n\n\n1️⃣ QUESTION REFORMULATION\n\n\\- Briefly restate the research question.\n\n\\- Identify the analytical dimensions or issues implied by the question.\n\n\\---\n\n2️⃣ CENTRAL THESIS OF THE CORPUS\n\n\\- What is the main idea emerging from the sources that best answers the question?\n\n\\---\n\n3️⃣ THEMATIC ANALYSIS\n\nIdentify the major themes that illuminate the research question.\n\nMinimum: \\*\\*3 themes\\*\\*\n\nFor each theme provide:\n\n\\- detailed explanation\n\n\\- key concepts\n\n\\- empirical findings or data mentioned\n\n\\- methodologies used\n\n\\- contribution of the theme to answering the research question\n\n\\---\n\n4️⃣ CONVERGENCES AND DIVERGENCES BETWEEN SOURCES\n\nIdentify and explain:\n\n\\- areas of agreement\n\n\\- contradictions\n\n\\- differing interpretations\n\n\\- competing hypotheses\n\n\\---\n\n5️⃣ NUANCE RADAR\n\nExplicitly list:\n\n\\- conditional statements (\"if\", \"however\", \"except\")\n\n\\- methodological limitations\n\n\\- uncertainty zones\n\n\\- potential biases\n\n\\---\n\n6️⃣ KEY CITATIONS (VERBATIM)\n\nExtract the most important statements from the sources.\n\nRules:\n\n\\- quote them verbatim\n\n\\- indicate the source\n\n\\- translate into French if necessary\n\n\\- briefly explain why each citation is important\n\n\\---\n\n7️⃣ FINAL SYNTHESIS\n\nProvide a clear answer to the research question by summarizing:\n\n\\- what is strongly supported by the sources\n\n\\- what remains debated\n\n\\- the main implications of the findings\n\n\n\nEnjoy !"},"media":[],"metadata":{"timestamp":"2026-03-15T19:44:29.000Z","likes":252,"shares":0,"views":0},"comments":[{"id":"oan9tap","author":{"name":"Dry-Writing-2811","url":""},"content":"We can do both. I love reading real paper books AND getting quick summaries of topics without spending 10 hours to read tons of documents and watching 50 hours of videos","timestamp":"2026-03-15T21:58:24.000Z","likes":25},{"id":"oaomaa0","author":{"name":"BikerMustafa","url":""},"content":"Wow Great Prompt. I wish i had same in detail prompt for Stock Market 🤔🤔🤔🤔.\n\nThanks this will help me Great Man. Thanks A ton ","timestamp":"2026-03-16T02:33:29.000Z","likes":5},{"id":"ob4em5r","author":{"name":"Adventurous-Wind-361","url":""},"content":"why translate in \"French if nessesary?\"","timestamp":"2026-03-18T14:14:33.000Z","likes":2,"replies":[{"id":"ob7v79h","author":{"name":"menxiaoyong","url":""},"content":"Maybe French is OP's first language","timestamp":"2026-03-19T00:21:13.000Z","likes":1}]},{"id":"oan9cln","author":{"name":"royalpyroz","url":""},"content":"I'm so sick of AI and prompts. What are we doing? Can we just go back to reading books and not understanding anything anymore ","timestamp":"2026-03-15T21:55:57.000Z","likes":7,"replies":[{"id":"oangtet","author":{"name":"TheLawIsSacred","url":""},"content":"I overall I'm sick of prompts, as well, but occasionally I run across good ones- this one, on a skim, looks like it could be generally useful across the app.","timestamp":"2026-03-15T22:35:49.000Z","likes":23},{"id":"oappe7n","author":{"name":"Additional-Syrup-881","url":""},"content":"why are you here then. this sub is exactly for what you hate.","timestamp":"2026-03-16T08:01:07.000Z","likes":11},{"id":"oapkedi","author":{"name":"M4xs0n","url":""},"content":"These kind of posts are annoying af, yes. It‘s like they found the holy grail","timestamp":"2026-03-16T07:11:00.000Z","likes":-2}]},{"id":"oapdb80","author":{"name":"menxiaoyong","url":""},"content":"Thanks for sharing. I use this for Notebooklm and deep research, it all works well","timestamp":"2026-03-16T06:01:39.000Z","likes":1},{"id":"oawy2yh","author":{"name":"zoborob","url":""},"content":"Thank you for sharing","timestamp":"2026-03-17T11:50:03.000Z","likes":1},{"id":"ocgez4v","author":{"name":"PrestigiousDingo109","url":""},"content":"What exactly is the point of using \"#,\" just asking out of curiosity.","timestamp":"2026-03-25T20:12:29.000Z","likes":1}],"shareId":"ZLXpvp1Wot","createdAt":1774582579850,"viewCount":0,"options":{"username":"bboroughf"},"aiComments":[],"ownerUsername":"bboroughf","canonicalUrl":"https://social-archive.org/bboroughf/ZLXpvp1Wot"},{"platform":"reddit","id":"1rxrqaj","url":"https://www.reddit.com/r/ProductManagement/comments/1rxrqaj/what_should_prds_look_like/","title":"What should PRDs look like?","author":{"name":"SidAkshat","url":"","handle":"u/SidAkshat","avatar":"https://styles.redditmedia.com/t5_b3j2l/styles/profileIcon_snood901a1f4-ef86-4fbf-9826-13149be124c7-headshot-f.png"},"content":{"text":"PMs of Reddit! What should PRDs look like? In recent times, every PRD I come across is just AI slop. While AI largely gets the structure right, what's missing is real context. I am a new PM (3yrs of experience in a startup), so I have tried to experiment a bit with the structure of PRDs since my products are largely technical in nature. But now I'm curious as to what \"good\" PRDs look like? At this point it seems like a mythical beast that people have only heard stories about. Can you guys give me some pointers? Does anyone have a repo where I can read some real PRDs, maybe for products that are now live?\n\nRead more"},"media":[],"metadata":{"timestamp":"2026-03-19T05:19:24.000Z","likes":38,"shares":0,"views":0},"comments":[{"id":"ob9841e","author":{"name":"ShanghaiBebop","url":""},"content":"It should look like whatever it takes to get something built in your org. \n\nI’m serious. The point of the prd is to ultimately help your team build the right thing. Everything else is secondary. \n\nThat looks different for every org and every product. \n\nMinimally you need to answer why you should build this product and what problem the product is solving for. \n","timestamp":"2026-03-19T05:41:13.000Z","likes":102,"replies":[{"id":"ob9cyy1","author":{"name":"gormendizer","url":""},"content":"This is the right answer.\n\nIf you can get it built with a note scribbled on a napkin, that's your PRD.","timestamp":"2026-03-19T06:26:13.000Z","likes":15},{"id":"ob9ajuq","author":{"name":"cost4nz4","url":""},"content":"Yup","timestamp":"2026-03-19T06:03:29.000Z","likes":3}]},{"id":"ob97jtl","author":{"name":"Muppetmeister","url":""},"content":"Honestly, the best PRDs are the ones that actually get read.\n\nYour audience is two-fold: business stakeholders want to understand the opportunity, engineers need enough clarity to build the right thing. A PRD should be written for both audiences in mind. \n\nSo a better heuristic is if a PRD conveys the problem space and people actually use it (big emphasis here) then it’s a good PRD.\n\nFor me right now in my current company, that means concise writing, visual aids, and bullets. Although this could also be a sign of the times because everyone’s attention (and “willingness” to read lengthy docs) is limited. ","timestamp":"2026-03-19T05:36:09.000Z","likes":31,"replies":[{"id":"obay9cq","author":{"name":"Copernican","url":""},"content":"I agree about willingness to read and fostering a culture of reading. If having a company standard template creates a better culture of reading the documentation, that's great.\n\nA good PRD is what allows you as a PM to take PTO without it being a development blocker or getting interrupted with \"urgent\" phone calls because the PRD is unclear. A good PRD should allow you to avoid meetings at weird hours of the night if you have engineering teams in other timezones that work asynchronously with PM, because the PRD is clear and engineers can understand it.\n\nI am always puzzled by the PMs that think PRD's are worthless, because I view them as a way to save myself from endless redundant meetings and slack pings.","timestamp":"2026-03-19T13:51:30.000Z","likes":3}]},{"id":"ob9ow8d","author":{"name":"inspectorgadget9999","url":""},"content":"The last PRD I created I used AI. I was open about where it was AI, but leading the call, I just scrolled through the document, stopping and elaborating on certain areas that I felt were important - like scope and RACI. We went through a few iterations to get it right.\n\nBut I'm the only one that has opened it since, mainly to use it to push back against scope creep.\n\nOP, if your company doesn't have a template just us AI.\n\nStakeholder buy in is more important than the format. If you're worried, then have a pre meeting one to one and get them on side before the actual PRD presentation.","timestamp":"2026-03-19T08:21:02.000Z","likes":8},{"id":"ob9sq81","author":{"name":"Mobtor","url":""},"content":"Backing up u/ShanghaiBebop here on the \"whatever it takes to get something bulit in your org\", but would add that it's always about achieving the outcome.\n\nWe used to write PRDs, but no one would read them more than once, and once was a good result.\n\nIn my world, I run two teams, manage/mentor several other PMs and am lead SME on too many fields, as well as being the glue person in that anything complicated and unresolvable earlier by a Sales, Marketing, Support, Success, Implementation or Training team ultimately ends up on my desk.\n\nI don't have time to write complex docs that no one else will read, unless its to clarify my own thinking first.\n\nPrimarily my two teams work off two simple list tables, Priority and To Be Shaped. I keep a third list in the same place that helps me structure and prioritise unshaped feedback, problems, ideas.\n\nIt's working far better for us to meet regularly twice a week, one 'current review' and one 'forward planning' to work through things together in discussion and debate than to have endless document writing and reading. The right people have a channel to ad-hoc any question or request at any time for clarification that we document after a decision was made. \n\nSpend that time getting real close to real customer problems instead. Spend that time thinking about the vision, the mission, the customer research, and how to get to where you want to go, and what all the moving pieces are and how to ask your engineers the right questions. Spend that time constantly talking about the vision for the future.\n\nSometimes all you need is a simple User Problem, Desired Solution Outcome and prioritisation matrix and then to actually bring engineers into your world of customer problems to talk about it regularly.","timestamp":"2026-03-19T08:58:32.000Z","likes":4},{"id":"ob9us8e","author":{"name":"ltnj","url":""},"content":"It should clearly communicate what must be done, what can be done if time allows and what should not be done. You need to clearly state what systems or products participate in achieving what's needed to be built/changed as well as the main actors (i.e. user roles, system). Highly depends on domain or ecosystem you're working in. \n \nNot too deep into exact functionality or design, as those are for later. Identifying use cases, at least most critical helps.\n\nThere's decades worth of literature available on the topic and it's worth looking to grasp the fundamentals despite the prevalence of AI today. Of course AI can support in writing, but I feel it's hard to offload to it entirely.","timestamp":"2026-03-19T09:18:19.000Z","likes":5},{"id":"ob9xjvx","author":{"name":"Fireindahoe6","url":""},"content":"The best format for a PRD is going to be as follows:\n\n1) Business/Tech Product Memo:\n What is the problem we are building upon. \n Why now.\n What it intends to do. \n What it might change.\n Core Metrics (if needed)\n\n2) Working parts in flowchart (annotate epics/user stories) as decision flow tree. (Branch and expand links into separate pages, depending on Engg req. silo) \n\n3) Q&A section. (Open, marked with Date asked and answered)\n\n4) Fallbacks. \n\nReading time should not exceed 5 minutes. \n\n\nAs others have already pointed out, use what allows you to communicate best and get it built, across all stakeholder teams. But the most simple format is the one given above. \n\nI've worked across 6 orgs in various industries which had their own set of what PRD is. This format works in 4/6 orgs.","timestamp":"2026-03-19T09:44:23.000Z","likes":5},{"id":"obccfy8","author":{"name":"abhi93_","url":""},"content":"None. I am a product manager with 8 years in the industry now and I developed this atmosphere where nobody needs a PRD. I dont get the idea of a PRD tbh. A product brief is enough the understand the problem and the solution. \n\nBut, one thing i have done is writing very detailed acceptance criteria. I am a big fan of GWT which flows in a journey and written from end users perspective. Detailed requirements should be where the engineers and QA are working on ..and that is the jira tickets...those should be very detailed imo. Grew a product from 6M ARR to 13M ARR without ever writing a PRD. my dev team never asked for it ..my stakeholder are aligned in a deck they can refer to. Nobody has ever asked for PRD. \n\nI beleive its just with companies who try to implement these product management frameworks because they follow a PM influencer on linkedIn. \n\nFor me same goes for sprint planning. I do cycles of 6 weeks...team gives me confidence level on what can be acheived. Team output is measured on the outcome not the storypoints. ","timestamp":"2026-03-19T17:50:38.000Z","likes":3},{"id":"ob9mdgh","author":{"name":"Separate-Hedgehog388","url":""},"content":"Developer notes on the figma files and figma prototype, jira is only for bug tracking as it was meant to be","timestamp":"2026-03-19T07:56:37.000Z","likes":2},{"id":"obazo7q","author":{"name":"Skillifyabhishek","url":""},"content":"Three years in at a startup you probably have more instinct than you think. A good PRD answers four things clearly: what's the problem, who has it, how will we know we solved it, and what are we actually building. Everything else is supporting detail. If it's longer than two pages before the specs, it's probably too long.","timestamp":"2026-03-19T13:58:42.000Z","likes":2},{"id":"obca9kr","author":{"name":"thereasonigotbangs","url":""},"content":"Mine are ulta streamlined one pagers: problem, solution, functional requirements, open questions, and appendix.","timestamp":"2026-03-19T17:40:26.000Z","likes":2}],"shareId":"lJ0RsSAIq8","createdAt":1774582437522,"viewCount":0,"options":{"username":"bboroughf"},"aiComments":[],"ownerUsername":"bboroughf","canonicalUrl":"https://social-archive.org/bboroughf/lJ0RsSAIq8"},{"platform":"reddit","id":"obdqwxc","url":"https://www.reddit.com/r/Anthropic/comments/1rybv8f/comment/obdqwxc/","title":"Anthropic University - Very handsome terminal","author":{"name":"managing_redditor","url":"","handle":"managing_redditor","avatar":"https://i.redd.it/snoovatar/avatars/nftv2_bmZ0X2VpcDE1NToxMzdfYmZkNjcwNjY3MDUzZTUxN2E5N2FmZTU2YzkxZTRmODNmMTE2MGJkM18yNjkyNjc_rare_41c229b5-7d71-4fbe-a26f-8c21ff67abdd-headshot.png"},"content":{"text":"There are many ways to get this look, but personally I use (1) https://starship.rs/ for the pretty shell prompt and (2) https://github.com/eza-community/eza for the pretty ls output. Ask Claude about these tools if you're less familiar with terminal configuration."},"media":[],"metadata":{"timestamp":"2026-03-19T22:06:39.000Z","likes":34,"shares":0,"views":0},"comments":[{"id":"obesvvi","author":{"name":"bchan7","url":""},"content":"this is th answer","timestamp":"2026-03-20T01:36:43.000Z","likes":3},{"id":"obkl0gt","author":{"name":"The_Landerdormguy","url":""},"content":"Does it cost any extra compute \nMy computer almost at it's limit lol","timestamp":"2026-03-20T22:40:17.000Z","likes":1}],"shareId":"Izxl94y90q","createdAt":1774576806478,"viewCount":1,"options":{"username":"bboroughf"},"aiComments":[],"ownerUsername":"bboroughf","canonicalUrl":"https://social-archive.org/bboroughf/Izxl94y90q"},{"platform":"reddit","id":"1s0i1ys","url":"https://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeCode/comments/1s0i1ys/musthave_settings_hacks_for_claude_code/","title":"Must-have settings / hacks for Claude Code?","author":{"name":"jnkue","url":"","handle":"u/jnkue","avatar":"https://www.redditstatic.com/avatars/defaults/v2/avatar_default_0.png"},"content":{"text":"I really enjoy using Claude Code, but I feel like I’m still leaving a lot of potential on the table.\n\nMy current workflow looks like this: \nI start Claude in the terminal, describe what I want as clearly as possible in plan mode, iterate on the plan until I’m happy with it, and then let it execute. End-to-end, this usually takes around \\~20 minutes per feature.\n\nHowever, I keep hearing people talk about agents running autonomously for hours and handling much more complex workflows. I can’t quite figure out how to get to that level.\n\nSo I’m curious: \nWhat are your most important settings, workflows, or “hacks” to get the most out of Claude Code—without overcomplicating things?\n\nWould love to hear how you’ve optimized your setup "},"media":[],"metadata":{"timestamp":"2026-03-22T10:18:01.000Z","likes":334,"shares":0,"views":0},"comments":[{"id":"obtd7zs","author":{"name":"Quiet_Ad6585","url":""},"content":"I just use Superpowers and Dangerously Skip Permissions. I will either go through a very lengthy interview and planning phase with Superpowers, or i will tell it a very rough idea, tell it to take as long as I can and to draft without asking me for any input at all first. \n\nIt builds a good draft at first, and then I fine tune it to what I want. Super useful! ","timestamp":"2026-03-22T10:25:14.000Z","likes":107,"replies":[{"id":"obtjxtr","author":{"name":"spenpal_dev","url":""},"content":"My same exact setup. I started getting super annoyed with how many permissions Claude kept asking to get work done, so I made an alias called “claudey” (short for Claude-yolo) that enables dangerously skip permissions.\n\nAnd Superpowers just asks the right questions when I’m brainstorming with it.","timestamp":"2026-03-22T11:24:36.000Z","likes":29},{"id":"obw8a1a","author":{"name":"AndyNemmity","url":""},"content":"I think Superpowers is very minimal. What am I missing? \n\nIs it that being minimal is a value as it provides value to users without being super complex? \n\nMaybe I need to work towards that a bit, because I feel like it's missing a lot of patterns that are very important for me to get value from. https://github.com/notque/claude-code-toolkit","timestamp":"2026-03-22T19:53:17.000Z","likes":5},{"id":"obtroqx","author":{"name":"Indianapiper","url":""},"content":"You need superpowers, gstack, or something else for legit work. Also, sonarqube.","timestamp":"2026-03-22T12:23:57.000Z","likes":10},{"id":"obtet25","author":{"name":"back_to_the_homeland","url":""},"content":"I do as well but it’s never ran for more than 40 minutes for me. I guess I am an independent contractor for a midsize company though ","timestamp":"2026-03-22T10:39:47.000Z","likes":3},{"id":"obu1lx6","author":{"name":"The_Hindu_Hammer","url":""},"content":"If anyone wants to take the next step beyond superpowers I created a similar tool but it uses review agents at every step, a more deterministic plan and success criteria, and fully autonomous workflow from idea to PR. It also automatically handles permissions without using dangerously skip. \n\nhttps://github.com/nikhilsitaram/claude-caliper","timestamp":"2026-03-22T13:26:27.000Z","likes":6},{"id":"obuza8k","author":{"name":"max420","url":""},"content":"Yeah this has become my go to workflow also.","timestamp":"2026-03-22T16:18:22.000Z","likes":1},{"id":"obv265m","author":{"name":"epicsysutum","url":""},"content":"Which plan do you use with superpower \nIs 20$ plan enough ?","timestamp":"2026-03-22T16:32:07.000Z","likes":1},{"id":"obywqm6","author":{"name":"Strange-Poem","url":""},"content":"I used to use superpowers a lot, but lately, I've found the Plan mode good enough.","timestamp":"2026-03-23T05:32:51.000Z","likes":1},{"id":"obvpp8b","author":{"name":"ia42","url":""},"content":"I haven't tried superpowers yet, but I'm very happy with github's own speckit. https://speckit.org/","timestamp":"2026-03-22T18:22:29.000Z","likes":0}]},{"id":"obtq9zh","author":{"name":"randomrealname","url":""},"content":"I'm not kidding when I say this, Claude knows best how to organize agents. Create a dedicated folder, give claude access, and ask it to set up agents that it can call. It will do it itself. Just tell it the type of agents.","timestamp":"2026-03-22T12:14:04.000Z","likes":35,"replies":[{"id":"obupp0f","author":{"name":"alphaQ314","url":""},"content":"Interesting. But what exactly is this doing differently, than just asking it to use subagents normally?","timestamp":"2026-03-22T15:32:35.000Z","likes":6}]},{"id":"obtkm8d","author":{"name":"Deep_Ad1959","url":""},"content":"biggest unlock for me was hooks, not skip-permissions. I have a hook that runs the test suite after every file edit so claude catches its own mistakes mid-session instead of piling up broken code for 20 minutes. MCP servers are the other thing nobody talks about enough - I set up one for browser automation so claude can actually navigate to the page and verify what it built. those two together let me kick off a task and come back an hour later to something that actually works.\n\nfwiw I built the mcp server I use for this - https://github.com/mediar-ai/mcp-server-macos-use","timestamp":"2026-03-22T11:30:22.000Z","likes":45,"replies":[{"id":"obu69mq","author":{"name":"Physical_Gold_1485","url":""},"content":"Every file edit seems a bit excessive, could just have instructions to claude to include running the suite after every phase","timestamp":"2026-03-22T13:53:00.000Z","likes":11},{"id":"obtlptz","author":{"name":"MakanLagiDud3","url":""},"content":"Wow, that's awesome, I've always been paranoid so it can catch itself before deleting anything? What example in setting it up? ","timestamp":"2026-03-22T11:39:26.000Z","likes":1},{"id":"obuf66d","author":{"name":"--Spaceman-Spiff--","url":""},"content":"Do you prefer your browser mcp over the built in Claude chrome integration?","timestamp":"2026-03-22T14:39:55.000Z","likes":1},{"id":"obuvm63","author":{"name":"touristtam","url":""},"content":"I am not understanding the advantage vs regular githooks on pre-commit. Can you enlighten me?","timestamp":"2026-03-22T16:01:11.000Z","likes":1},{"id":"oc8shoa","author":{"name":"marcopaulodirect","url":""},"content":"Thanks for sharing this. Could you please share the hook and browser automation MPC you mentioned? I could really use that right now.","timestamp":"2026-03-24T17:51:29.000Z","likes":1}]},{"id":"obu1mdq","author":{"name":"Ok-Drawing-2724","url":""},"content":"Biggest unlock for me was saving state to files (plan.md, tasks.md) and reloading each run. Feels like the agent “remembers” without blowing context.","timestamp":"2026-03-22T13:26:32.000Z","likes":11,"replies":[{"id":"oby8d4j","author":{"name":"thedoge","url":""},"content":"This would be a useful native addition to superpowers. I work in codespaces, and sometimes executing on a plan will get interrupted. Instead of Claude having to think about what was already accomplished via git history, it can just reference the task progress","timestamp":"2026-03-23T02:29:58.000Z","likes":2}]},{"id":"obtsh4v","author":{"name":"stathisntonas","url":""},"content":"rtk-ai, has saved about 100M tokens this week","timestamp":"2026-03-22T12:29:23.000Z","likes":10,"replies":[{"id":"obvgc79","author":{"name":"MegaSmile","url":""},"content":"rtk looked very interesting but I saw some worrying github issues where it had completely broken the output of certain commands. ","timestamp":"2026-03-22T17:38:55.000Z","likes":3},{"id":"obuk1ti","author":{"name":"BareMetalAlchemists","url":""},"content":"i use context mode and rtk-ai. Il it’s redundant but savings are 📈","timestamp":"2026-03-22T15:04:35.000Z","likes":2}]},{"id":"obti7ch","author":{"name":"MucaGinger33","url":""},"content":"--dangerously-skip-permissions\n\nThis is the only hack you'll ever need. The rest is on you.","timestamp":"2026-03-22T11:09:45.000Z","likes":15,"replies":[{"id":"obtrh3e","author":{"name":"Indianapiper","url":""},"content":"Just use claude warden, it's way safer","timestamp":"2026-03-22T12:22:27.000Z","likes":2},{"id":"obtj7ly","author":{"name":"MakanLagiDud3","url":""},"content":"Very risky","timestamp":"2026-03-22T11:18:24.000Z","likes":4},{"id":"obu8m77","author":{"name":"Physical_Gold_1485","url":""},"content":"I got sick of typing it all the time, even typing \"claude\" so i aliased both to just \"c\" and now the c command always starts claude code in yolo mode, so lovely","timestamp":"2026-03-22T14:05:29.000Z","likes":2}]},{"id":"obubwkg","author":{"name":"karaposu","url":""},"content":"I went down the settings/config rabbit hole too, but the biggest unlock for me wasn't any particular hack it was understanding where things actually go wrong when you delegate to AI. Most of the time Claude doesn't fail because of a missing flag. It fails because the task wasn't scoped right, or the context wasn't set up, or you didn't define what 'done' looks like. I ended up mapping this out into six specific layers where misalignment happens, \n\nWhen you delegate work to AI, any misalignment can only occur at these six layers:\n\n1. Workspace Alignment — The environment and context aren’t set up correctly\n2. Task Alignment — The task is not understood well\n3. Action-Space Alignment — AI doesn’t know what action space should be used\n4. Action-Set Alignment — AI doesn’t understand what set of actions is preferable and feasible\n5. Coherence Alignment — AI doesn’t understand how the actions taken disturb existing alignments\n6. Outcome Alignment — AI doesn’t understand how actions taken and expected results are in mismatch\n\nthis is from my unpopular web book btw (https://karaposu.github.io/alignstack/)\n\n \nI believe this is the main hack anyone needs. Of course I use slash commands to avoid copy pasting etc but so far i dont need anything more complex.","timestamp":"2026-03-22T14:22:51.000Z","likes":14,"replies":[{"id":"obv7eap","author":{"name":"WolfOnWings","url":""},"content":"I think you have the right idea here. I realized a few days ago that the main bottleneck ultimately just boils down to one thing - prompting. I ended up spending a whole day using prompt-master to meta prompt. Prompting prompt-master to make a prompt which will design a certain skill has been a huge game changer.","timestamp":"2026-03-22T16:56:39.000Z","likes":3}]},{"id":"obuthqx","author":{"name":"GGJohnson1","url":""},"content":"This may be an unpopular opinion, but if you are using Claude code at work and are working on something important that can cause your company to lose a lot of money if an issue arises, dont change what you are doing. This is especially true when working on larger and more complex applications. If it is for personal use or for a product you are trying build and make money off of (meaning you can fix problems later after you have proven ROI) then it is worthwhile to let Claude run wild with some of these suggested settings. No matter how good your instructions are and how much valuable context Claude has on your repo, all it takes is 1 outage or security issue that gets traced back to you not supervising Claude well enough and your employment is at risk.","timestamp":"2026-03-22T15:50:59.000Z","likes":9},{"id":"obvi3wl","author":{"name":"CmdrCallandra","url":""},"content":"Still wondering why no one has mentioned get shit done yet. \n\n\nhttps://github.com/gsd-build/gsd-2\n\nThe project description\n\nA powerful meta-prompting, context engineering and spec-driven development system that enables agents to work for long periods of time autonomously without losing track of the big picture\n\nAm on a project I created using gsd, counting towards 30k lines of code in typescript.\nHad a small session at the start of the day where I defined my next milestone, what to expect, gotchas to look out for etc. Took about 20 minutes initially. Then the system wrote all down, structured it into work slices and went off for the next 4 hrs working, creating code, with test cases, checking output with playwright etc.\nOf course the milestone was implemented and I still have edge cases to optimize, but overall mission accomplished.\n\nFor me gsd was a game change to pure Claude code with dangerous permissions... ","timestamp":"2026-03-22T17:47:12.000Z","likes":3,"replies":[{"id":"oc3e654","author":{"name":"bobo-the-merciful","url":""},"content":"Very interested in GSD2 - tried it yesterday with Gemini and it just flopped straight away, so clearly tonnes of bugs to work out. I'm nervous about using it with the Claude API due to cost. Very excited though for the bugs to get ironed out - I'll run Gemini through it for sure once it feels ready for that.","timestamp":"2026-03-23T21:36:06.000Z","likes":1}]},{"id":"obvkrxc","author":{"name":"ryan_the_dev","url":""},"content":"I build these skills based off software engineering books. Such better code\n\nhttps://github.com/ryanthedev/code-foundations","timestamp":"2026-03-22T17:59:11.000Z","likes":3,"replies":[{"id":"obvnc8y","author":{"name":"interrupt_hdlr","url":""},"content":"why? how? is it actually better?","timestamp":"2026-03-22T18:11:14.000Z","likes":2},{"id":"obwkmv6","author":{"name":"rm-rf-rm","url":""},"content":"way way too convoluted and poorly explained. Especially to be used on top of CC that has baked in much of these things. And it isnt surprising that most of it is written by Claude to begin with seemingly.","timestamp":"2026-03-22T20:55:09.000Z","likes":1}]}],"shareId":"oN6CGxgqmM","createdAt":1774576576303,"viewCount":0,"options":{"username":"bboroughf"},"aiComments":[],"ownerUsername":"bboroughf","canonicalUrl":"https://social-archive.org/bboroughf/oN6CGxgqmM"},{"platform":"reddit","id":"1s0vhng","url":"https://www.reddit.com/r/ProductManagement/comments/1s0vhng/manual_setup_for_product_management_with_aiand/","title":"Manual Setup for Product Management with AI(and looking for feedback)","thumbnail":"https://social-archiver-api.social-archive.org/media/archives/bboroughf/H0SX59cRrK/media/0.png","author":{"name":"Real-Improvement-222","url":"","handle":"u/Real-Improvement-222","avatar":"https://i.redd.it/snoovatar/avatars/efa7b5c8-b1a4-4d85-a1be-dce7799d1e82-headshot.png"},"content":{"text":"Over the past 12 months I moved almost all my PM work into GitHub repos and Markdown files. Discovery, scoping, prototyping - running through a chat window or terminal. The unlock was maintaining a structured **context folder** per product: codebase, interviews, analytics, docs - all in one place, connected to live sources.\n\nWhen that context is current, every workflow (scoping a feature, synthesizing interviews, drafting a spec) runs fast and produces output I can actually trust.\n\nI'm now building a tool that structures and automates exactly this — building the product context and executing PM workflows on top of it.\n\nWould love feedback, opinions, pushback. Is this a workflow you recognize? What would make you actually use something like this?"},"media":[{"url":"https://social-archiver-api.social-archive.org/media/archives/bboroughf/H0SX59cRrK/media/0.png","type":"image"}],"metadata":{"timestamp":"2026-03-22T19:55:03.000Z","likes":102,"shares":0,"views":0},"comments":[{"id":"obwhumt","author":{"name":"GoingOffRoading","url":""},"content":"Did Claude make this for you?","timestamp":"2026-03-22T20:41:14.000Z","likes":19,"replies":[{"id":"obwjdae","author":{"name":"SeaMenCaptain","url":""},"content":"Ton of typos, so likely","timestamp":"2026-03-22T20:48:49.000Z","likes":11},{"id":"oc31p1t","author":{"name":"sonJokes","url":""},"content":"protip, ask Claude to generate a webpage as the visualization instead of an image. Especially with text-heavy views. ","timestamp":"2026-03-23T20:36:19.000Z","likes":4}]},{"id":"obybsgm","author":{"name":"cobramullet","url":""},"content":"Belongs on LinkedIn.","timestamp":"2026-03-23T02:51:42.000Z","likes":17},{"id":"obz88qj","author":{"name":"Aware_Cricket3032","url":""},"content":"No, I just connect to a notion space or a repo and run with it. Most of the folders you have are repetitive. What’s “Review Findings” vs “Reviews”?\n\nDo you have the users, usage, etc to support all this? Your company is an AI influencer generator that is bottom of the search page. \n\nStop circlejerking your setup and go do work. ","timestamp":"2026-03-23T07:22:54.000Z","likes":6,"replies":[{"id":"obzlfji","author":{"name":"Real-Improvement-222","url":""},"content":"The screenshots are about an influencer platforms product context. \n\nThere are resources: tracking data from Mixpanel, interview transcripts, etc.. and we us them all to define the biggets gaps in the product, design solution or even a prototype ","timestamp":"2026-03-23T09:33:15.000Z","likes":-2}]},{"id":"obwaduc","author":{"name":"laplaces_demon42","url":""},"content":"I’m using subagents; one for UX/customer stuff, one for data analysis, one for product (what we sell) knowledge, etc.\nThis works really well","timestamp":"2026-03-22T20:03:55.000Z","likes":3},{"id":"oby1uwd","author":{"name":"ggk1","url":""},"content":"I would love to try it if you made something where it would run me thru the set up asking questions and setting up the folders and stuff accordingly","timestamp":"2026-03-23T01:50:28.000Z","likes":3,"replies":[{"id":"obz8bby","author":{"name":"Aware_Cricket3032","url":""},"content":"You can do this, today, by typing this prompt into your chosen AI agent.","timestamp":"2026-03-23T07:23:36.000Z","likes":2}]},{"id":"obwas0e","author":{"name":"FishermanTiny8224","url":""},"content":"Using this workflow currently, started building agents that do those processes autonomously. Dealing with IT / secops limitations for API usage, but can overcome. Feel like this is easiest way. Building a UI for the rest of team to keep track of what I’m doing too helps for viz ","timestamp":"2026-03-22T20:05:56.000Z","likes":2,"replies":[{"id":"obwcolx","author":{"name":"spshulem","url":""},"content":"Highly recommend checking out BuildBetter.ai it does this on autopilot and with security/compliance approval","timestamp":"2026-03-22T20:15:35.000Z","likes":-8}]},{"id":"oby4d2b","author":{"name":"flatacthe","url":""},"content":"The cold start problem is real, I ran into the same thing and ended up using, webhook triggers to keep the context folder synced automatically so it stops being a manual chore. Once that piece was solid the rest of the workflows actually held up. Latenode made wiring that together pretty straightforward without needing much infra overhead.","timestamp":"2026-03-23T02:05:41.000Z","likes":2},{"id":"obyd07w","author":{"name":"scrotusaurus","url":""},"content":"Lame. ","timestamp":"2026-03-23T02:59:44.000Z","likes":2},{"id":"obzorh2","author":{"name":"resbeefspat","url":""},"content":"The cold start problem you mentioned is the hardest part honestly. I spent about 3 weeks just figuring out how to keep the context folder from, going stale before I wired up some webhook triggers to auto-sync it whenever source data changed. Once that was running the actual PM workflows got way more reliable because I wasn't second-guessing whether the context was current.","timestamp":"2026-03-23T10:03:34.000Z","likes":2},{"id":"oc0tn9v","author":{"name":"Such_Grace","url":""},"content":"The context-going-stale problem is what kills this workflow for most people, you build the perfect structure and then it drifts within a week. I ended up using Latenode to wire webhook triggers that auto-sync whenever source data changes, which mostly solved the manual upkeep that was eating my time.","timestamp":"2026-03-23T14:23:00.000Z","likes":2}],"shareId":"LWCIgnCevp","createdAt":1774576548560,"viewCount":0,"options":{"username":"bboroughf"},"aiComments":[],"ownerUsername":"bboroughf","canonicalUrl":"https://social-archive.org/bboroughf/LWCIgnCevp"},{"platform":"reddit","id":"1s154ig","url":"https://www.reddit.com/r/ArtificialInteligence/comments/1s154ig/wharton_researchers_just_proved_why_just_review/","title":"Wharton researchers just proved why \"just review the AI output\" doesn't work. Our brains literally give up.","thumbnail":"https://social-archiver-api.social-archive.org/media/archives/bboroughf/hJIbPmz7cO/media/0.png","author":{"name":"hiclemi","url":"","handle":"u/hiclemi","avatar":"https://styles.redditmedia.com/t5_3crzr/styles/communityIcon_uap5trxk5moe1.jpg"},"content":{"text":"A Wharton study from January 2026 just dropped and it puts hard numbers on something I've been trying to articulate for weeks. \n \nSource: \"Thinking—Fast, Slow, and Artificial\" by Steven D. Shaw and Gideon Nave (papers.ssrn.com) \n \nThe paper argues that AI isn't just a tool. It's a third thinking system. You know Kahneman's System 1 (fast intuition) and System 2 (slow analysis)? They're saying AI is now System 3, an external cognitive system that operates outside your brain. And when you use it enough, something happens that they call Cognitive Surrender. \n \nCognitive Surrender is when you stop verifying what the AI tells you, and you don't even realize you stopped. It's different from offloading, like using a calculator. With offloading you know the tool did the work. With surrender, your brain recodes the AI's answer as YOUR judgment. You genuinely believe you thought it through yourself. \n \nHere are the numbers from their experiment. 1,372 participants, 9,593 trials. \n \nWhen AI was right, 92.7% of people followed it. Fine. But when AI was WRONG, 79.8% still followed it. Almost 80% of people went with a wrong answer because AI said so. \n \nIt gets worse. Without AI, people scored 45.8% on their own. With correct AI they hit 71%. But with incorrect AI they dropped to 31.5%. That's BELOW their baseline. Meaning when AI gets it wrong, you actually perform worse than if you had no AI at all. \n \nAnd the part that really got me. When using AI, people's confidence went up by 11.7 percentage points regardless of whether the AI was right or wrong. You're more wrong AND more confident about it. \n \nI wrote a post a while back about what I called the Review Paradox. The idea was simple. If AI does all the work and you only review it, where does the skill to review come from? You can't build review judgment without doing the work yourself first. Developers are already dealing with this. Some teams have shifted to reviewing specs and architecture instead of code, because they realized humans can't meaningfully review AI-generated code at scale anymore. \n \nThis Wharton paper basically proves why. It's not just that reviewing is hard. It's that our brains are wired to surrender to the AI output. We're not lazy. We're not careless. Our cognitive architecture literally defaults to accepting what AI gives us, especially under time pressure. \n \nThe study also found that even when you add financial incentives and real-time feedback, cognitive surrender doesn't fully go away. It reduces, but it doesn't disappear. The instinct to just accept what AI says is that deep. \n \nThe only people who consistently resisted it were those with high fluid intelligence and high \"need for cognition,\" basically people who enjoy thinking hard for its own sake. Everyone else gradually surrendered. \n \nSo here's what I keep coming back to. The entire AI productivity pitch right now is \"let AI do the work, you just review and approve.\" Every product, every workflow, every company adopting AI assumes that human review is the safety net. But this research says that safety net has a massive hole in it. We approve things we shouldn't. We feel confident when we shouldn't. And we don't even notice it happening. \n \nI genuinely don't know what the answer is. Maybe the devs who shifted to reviewing specs instead of code are onto somthing. Maybe the answer is restructuring what humans review, not asking them to review everything. But the current model of \"AI generates, human reviews\" feels broken at a fundamental level now that I've read this paper. \n \nWhat do you guys think? Has anyone else read this study?"},"media":[{"url":"https://social-archiver-api.social-archive.org/media/archives/bboroughf/hJIbPmz7cO/media/0.png","type":"image"}],"metadata":{"timestamp":"2026-03-23T02:42:46.000Z","likes":465,"shares":0,"views":0},"comments":[{"id":"obyaenk","author":{"name":"AutoModerator","url":""},"content":"Submission statement required. Link posts require context. Either write a summary preferably in the post body (100+ characters) or add a top-level comment explaining the key points and why it matters to the AI community.\n\nLink posts without a submission statement may be removed (within 30min).\n\nI'm a bot. This action was performed automatically.\n\n\nI am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit (/message/compose/?to=/r/ArtificialInteligence) if you have any questions or concerns.","timestamp":"2026-03-23T02:42:48.000Z","likes":1},{"id":"obyh446","author":{"name":"no-name-here","url":""},"content":"Why is this post a screenshot of a hacker news post, with no actual link to any study, nor to the hacker news post, nor even to any article about the study?","timestamp":"2026-03-23T03:27:52.000Z","likes":199,"replies":[{"id":"obyp9nf","author":{"name":"snowsayer","url":""},"content":"Hacker News link: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47467913 \nPaper: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=6097646 (https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=6097646)","timestamp":"2026-03-23T04:28:40.000Z","likes":78},{"id":"obynp9d","author":{"name":"Disastrous_Room_927","url":""},"content":"That’s the standard of quality these days. ","timestamp":"2026-03-23T04:16:18.000Z","likes":41},{"id":"obz0isy","author":{"name":"Massive-Pickle-5490","url":""},"content":"OP suffers from Cognitive Surrender.","timestamp":"2026-03-23T06:07:55.000Z","likes":39},{"id":"obyttix","author":{"name":"_BreakingGood_","url":""},"content":"And why did OP not respond to this comment with a link to the resources and instead left it up for others to find? \n\nJust makes all this shit look sus as hell. ","timestamp":"2026-03-23T05:06:51.000Z","likes":26},{"id":"obzcmhl","author":{"name":"Opposite-Extreme1236","url":""},"content":"because op is a bot with no idea what it's doing","timestamp":"2026-03-23T08:06:33.000Z","likes":10},{"id":"obzhuqm","author":{"name":"Business-Light5644","url":""},"content":"\"cognitive surrender\" i guess","timestamp":"2026-03-23T08:58:35.000Z","likes":9},{"id":"obzw8wq","author":{"name":"Several_Beautiful343","url":""},"content":"Link to paper: https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=6097646","timestamp":"2026-03-23T11:05:37.000Z","likes":4},{"id":"oc08gi2","author":{"name":"Endothermic_Nuke","url":""},"content":"Because did you read the abstract of that paper? It reads dense. It’s not as easy to read and immediately get it as OP’s post. I don’t know about the screenshot but OP genuinely added clarity.","timestamp":"2026-03-23T12:28:51.000Z","likes":2},{"id":"oc0z6dl","author":{"name":"themoregames","url":""},"content":"Welcome to Idiocracy's version of reddit.","timestamp":"2026-03-23T14:50:45.000Z","likes":3},{"id":"oc2fhxd","author":{"name":"No_Knee3385","url":""},"content":"Vibe Posted. He's proving the study correct","timestamp":"2026-03-23T18:53:12.000Z","likes":3}]},{"id":"obyg7lr","author":{"name":"Entire-Tradition3735","url":""},"content":"This seemed obvious to me.\n\nLike watching the news, and expecting truth and honesty. But when you look into it, the story was heavily biased in favor of hype to increase ratings.\n\nBut you dont always have time to look closer into every story, so you just assume it's most all hype.\n\nSo now we have a \"boy who cried wolf\" scenario, where if the sky was falling and the news said it was falling, we'd actively doubt the truth.\n\nI've avoided AI for the same reason, and waiting to see the tools become more refined, as i dont want to take time babysitting and training an AI, that doesnt seem to be as useful as the hype says it is.","timestamp":"2026-03-23T03:21:30.000Z","likes":45,"replies":[{"id":"obyhueu","author":{"name":"MathewPerth","url":""},"content":"Yeh like AI is going to make society any dumber than most of our media/entertainment industry already has. At least AI allows you to actively engage with it.","timestamp":"2026-03-23T03:33:06.000Z","likes":10},{"id":"oc20ku0","author":{"name":"seacat8586","url":""},"content":"Part of it did and part was new to me. That people would outsource their thinking to AI seems obvious. When I run a complex spreadsheet, I accept the vast majority of its calculations. So, I started using AI to help grade essays. At first, I used it to make suggestions. With training and time pressure (and sheer boredom) I have it doing actual grading. It’s definitely a slippery slope. But this part seems obvious. \n\nWhat seems new is that I’d take on AIs positions as my own. So, if I ask it what my financial portfolio should look like, it gives a good answer. But I still think of it as advice from a third party, not my opinion of what’s best. But let’s say over time, every time I invest, I run every number, opinion, random thought thru AI, does its positions become virtually the same as mine and eventually, I just run it and go out and play while it does it all? Let’s play this out to an institution. If my company essentially does what I did individually and give, a bit at a time, all planning to AI. Do I then lay off anyone doing planning and convince myself it’s all what I wanted anyway. ","timestamp":"2026-03-23T17:44:11.000Z","likes":2},{"id":"oc0dy04","author":{"name":"Puzzleheaded_Fold466","url":""},"content":"News is a good context example.\n\nWhen people are experts in the field that is being reported on, we find that they identify a large number of errors, most often in vulgarizing articles by non-expert journalists.\n\nHowever, non-experts reading the same news are less skeptical and tend to overestimate the veracity of these articles, and are more likely to be swayed and adopt the opinions found in these media productions.\n\nSomehow the recognition of incorrectness in one domain does not translate in skepticism for other topics.\n\nThis research needs to compare those numbers to how people respond to incorrect advice from human sources that they trust. Doctors and mechanics for example.\n\nAs it is, we are lacking a baseline context against which to compare this data. \n\nIs it worst ? Is it better ?\n\nI guarantee the baseline isn’t 100% and 0%.","timestamp":"2026-03-23T13:01:03.000Z","likes":1},{"id":"oc3vmna","author":{"name":"saijanai","url":""},"content":"Google search admists that each person is an echo chamber, and that it has gotten infintiely worse with AI being incproprated into things.\n\nIf I want to verify things now, I use an incognito window and hope it doesn't recognize my wording habits about questions to answer based on that.","timestamp":"2026-03-23T23:06:10.000Z","likes":1},{"id":"oc033ak","author":{"name":"Worth_Plastic5684","url":""},"content":"You could run this study with a rigged calculator, but there are no reddit upvotes in that.","timestamp":"2026-03-23T11:54:06.000Z","likes":-1}]},{"id":"obyduga","author":{"name":"jrdnmdhl","url":""},"content":"The best use cases for AI are the ones that solve hard problems with easy verification. The best AI apps are the ones that do the best job of serving up the verification to the user in the most convenient way possible.","timestamp":"2026-03-23T03:05:21.000Z","likes":20,"replies":[{"id":"oc5bzi9","author":{"name":"latisimusdorsi","url":""},"content":"Verification or validation?","timestamp":"2026-03-24T04:18:27.000Z","likes":1}]},{"id":"obyeox2","author":{"name":"LostInGradients","url":""},"content":"I wonder if maybe the same thing happens to a lesser degree about information you \"find\". Eg you read about some interesting fact or idea on reddit or other, and then you repeat it. But at least for me there is this weird effect where I didn't come up with it, but I did find it and valued it, so I then act like it is a bit \"mine\" now.","timestamp":"2026-03-23T03:11:09.000Z","likes":16,"replies":[{"id":"oc0d5rn","author":{"name":"Northern_candles","url":""},"content":"Yeah see all \"I did my research bro\" (listened to podcast that agrees with my bias) and \"I learned x about y\" (heard it from an authoritative source with 0 verification).\n\nHumans are always like this, we are not robots running proofs on everything we hear or learn. When you learn something in school are you deriving it from first principles or are you just accepting it because that is taught what is \"right\"? And we know throughout history what is \"right\" changes.","timestamp":"2026-03-23T12:56:36.000Z","likes":2}]},{"id":"obymkla","author":{"name":"GarageStackDev","url":""},"content":"This study makes it abundantly clear that AI cannot be safely or effectively leveraged by everyone. The data suggest that only roughly 1/3 of the population possesses the cognitive sophistication required to engage with AI critically, without falling prey to so called cognitive surrender. But for the majority of people reliance on AI risks not just inefficiency... but a counterproductive erosion of judgment... where outputs are internalized as ones own reasoning, often with misplaced confidence.","timestamp":"2026-03-23T04:07:39.000Z","likes":15,"replies":[{"id":"oc0ahms","author":{"name":"KnubblMonster","url":""},"content":"This kinda just confirmed what we know about the general public in regard to all activities that involve critical thinking.","timestamp":"2026-03-23T12:41:07.000Z","likes":2},{"id":"obzn44w","author":{"name":"sarindong","url":""},"content":"one study, based on a new theoretical framework of the authors' devising, does not on its own make that clear. ","timestamp":"2026-03-23T09:48:55.000Z","likes":0}]},{"id":"obydn4m","author":{"name":"people_are_idiots_","url":""},"content":"We're screwed as a society","timestamp":"2026-03-23T03:03:59.000Z","likes":13,"replies":[{"id":"obyh3cs","author":{"name":"MathewPerth","url":""},"content":"We've been screwing long before AI.","timestamp":"2026-03-23T03:27:43.000Z","likes":7}]},{"id":"obyqzs0","author":{"name":"miles_tails0511","url":""},"content":"This makes me recall Jonathan Blow’s talk on how it’s possible we as a civilization can “forget” about technology. Moving forward in tech is not and should not be taken for granted. \nWith our collective grasp towards information slipping outward from our minds into these model weights, I worry more and more of us may soon forget how to ask useful questions. “Forget” in the sense that we failed to pass on our pre-AI era reasoning skills to the next generation.\n\nHis talk was in 2019 before all these things came, and in the 1st QnA, he he made a eerie passing mention about AI coding that still made me go 🥶\n\nHere’s the talk if anyone is interested \nhttps://youtu.be/ZSRHeXYDLko","timestamp":"2026-03-23T04:42:54.000Z","likes":12,"replies":[{"id":"obz9bk4","author":{"name":"smolquestion","url":""},"content":"https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5ODzO7Lz_pw (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5ODzO7Lz_pw)\n\nit feels like this old toaster project has a similar undertone. even more relevant today :)","timestamp":"2026-03-23T07:33:39.000Z","likes":1},{"id":"oc0av81","author":{"name":"mrbombasticat","url":""},"content":"Didn't believe Warhammer 40k could become a prophecy - in regards to humanity's twindling grasp on science.","timestamp":"2026-03-23T12:43:21.000Z","likes":1}]},{"id":"obykkg4","author":{"name":"toadi","url":""},"content":"This is actually a good thing 20% of the people can do it and are critically. Means the hiring pool for AI supervision just got a lot smaller ;)\n\n","timestamp":"2026-03-23T03:52:49.000Z","likes":6,"replies":[{"id":"obzcdwa","author":{"name":"bandersnatchh","url":""},"content":"Lmao. \n\nReally high opinion that you’re one of the 20%\n","timestamp":"2026-03-23T08:04:10.000Z","likes":3},{"id":"oc0w8sl","author":{"name":"gorgonstairmaster","url":""},"content":"Dunning-Kruger intensifies","timestamp":"2026-03-23T14:36:07.000Z","likes":1}]},{"id":"obyffyk","author":{"name":"hutch_man0","url":""},"content":"Fascinating, though sadly not surprising. Glad we have some data behind this. There are very few people with \"high fluid intelligence and high need for cognition\". \n\n\nInteresting another article (https://www.reddit.com/r/BetterOffline/comments/1rvj9i2/evidence_grows_that_ai_chatbots_are_dunningkruger/) recently showed chat AI is a Dunning Kruger machine for humans. This comes from the sycophantic nature of chatbots.","timestamp":"2026-03-23T03:16:16.000Z","likes":5}],"shareId":"BVLGaYPETB","createdAt":1774575380252,"viewCount":0,"options":{"username":"bboroughf"},"aiComments":[],"ownerUsername":"bboroughf","canonicalUrl":"https://social-archive.org/bboroughf/BVLGaYPETB"},{"platform":"reddit","id":"1s1nqm1","url":"https://www.reddit.com/r/PromptEngineering/comments/1s1nqm1/most_prompt_engineering_advice_stops_at_be/","title":"Most prompt engineering advice stops at \"be specific.\" The real skill gap starts at chaining.","thumbnail":"https://social-archiver-api.social-archive.org/media/archives/bboroughf/nEYgzL2cp5/media/0.webp","author":{"name":"Popular-Help5516","url":"","handle":"u/Popular-Help5516","avatar":"https://www.redditstatic.com/avatars/defaults/v2/avatar_default_2.png"},"content":{"text":"Genuine question for this sub — how many of you are actually doing multi-step prompt workflows vs just single prompts?\n\nBecause I feel like theres this ceiling nobody talks about. Every tutorial, every course, every youtube vid says the same stuff: be specific, give context, use examples. Yeah ok cool. Thats table stakes at this point, everyone here already knows that.\n\nThe thing that actually changed how I work with AI was chaining — basically breaking a complex task into steps where output of step 1 feeds into step 2.\n\nHeres an example I use literally every week:\n\nStep 1: \"Analyze this document and extract the 5 key arguments\" → gives me a structured summary\n\nStep 2: \"For each argument, whats the strongest evidence and the weakest assumption?\" → now I got critical analysis\n\nStep 3: \"Draft a response addressing the 3 weakest assumptions. Professional but direct, under 500 words\" → done. ready to send.\n\nWhole thing takes like 3 mins. Before this I would try cram everything into one massive prompt and get mediocre results everytime. AI would loose focus halfway, mix up the analysis with the response, forget constraints from the beginning of the prompt.\n\nBreaking it into steps fixed basically all of that. Each step is focused, each output is checkable before you move on. And if step 2 gives garbage I just redo step 2 not the whole thing.\n\nSome other chains I run regulary:\n\n* Research: gather sources → summarize each → find contradictions → write synthesis\n* Code review: list functions → check each for bugs → prioritize by severity → draft fix for top 3\n* Email: analyze original email for tone → draft response matching tone → cut to under 150 words\n\nThe pattern is always decompose → process each peice → recombine. Once you see it you cant unsee it tbh. Every complex task is just a chain of simple ones.\n\nWrote up a longer guide with more examples and how to structure the handoffs between steps if anyones interested: [https://findskill.ai/blog/prompt-chaining-guide/](https://findskill.ai/blog/prompt-chaining-guide/)\n\nCurious tho — is chaining standard practice here or are most people still doing one-shot prompts? Whats your best chain?"},"media":[{"url":"https://social-archiver-api.social-archive.org/media/archives/bboroughf/nEYgzL2cp5/media/0.webp","type":"image","width":1200,"height":630}],"metadata":{"timestamp":"2026-03-23T17:38:41.000Z","likes":47,"shares":0,"views":0},"comments":[{"id":"oc2ti2w","author":{"name":"parthkafanta","url":""},"content":"Yep, chaining is the real unlock. Smaller steps gives cleaner outputs and easier fixes.\n\n\n\n","timestamp":"2026-03-23T19:58:26.000Z","likes":4},{"id":"oc63ob7","author":{"name":"islandlogic","url":""},"content":"Yep, been doing this with complex projects and problem solving. Especially useful given the impact of context rot.","timestamp":"2026-03-24T08:32:25.000Z","likes":3,"replies":[{"id":"oc64f4c","author":{"name":"Popular-Help5516","url":""},"content":"This","timestamp":"2026-03-24T08:39:51.000Z","likes":2}]},{"id":"oc4vf7u","author":{"name":"EchoLongworth","url":""},"content":"Langgraph and langchain look up the ibm high level videos on the terminology","timestamp":"2026-03-24T02:26:09.000Z","likes":1},{"id":"oc6el8k","author":{"name":"UBIAI","url":""},"content":"Chaining is 100% standard once you've hit that wall. The thing I'd add is that the handoff quality between steps matters as much as the individual prompts - being explicit about format of the output in step 1 so step 2 can actually parse it cleanly is where most people slip up. At work we do this for document extraction pipelines and a poorly structured intermediate output will silently degrade every downstream step.","timestamp":"2026-03-24T10:13:19.000Z","likes":1},{"id":"oc6qr39","author":{"name":"tedbradly","url":""},"content":"Yeah, I use chaining. You can do it in a single prompt although it might work better in two or more prompts. E.g.\n\n\"Generate an exhaustive list of things an editor does for their client. Make sure to include, in that list, spelling, grammar, orthography, and clarity quality checks.\" (The ones at the end are what I would have asked it to check for, but the list it generates has far more things it thinks an editor should check for.)\n\n\"For the text I paste below [that has this audience and serves this goal], acting as an editor, perform each of the previously generated services. For each correction or suggestion, show an excerpt from the original text, discuss the reasoning behind the potential change, and provide a replacement excerpt.\"\n\nI very often chain together a generation prompt, AI helping me fill out a list of duties or behaviors or situations or anything, and the second query using that list in some type of way. It feels rather programmatic except the language is English. Very cool stuff.\n\nI think most people would just say something like, \"Be an editor. Check this for issues and give recommendations on how to resolve them: [text].\"","timestamp":"2026-03-24T11:45:33.000Z","likes":1},{"id":"oc6rn5r","author":{"name":"RonocNYC","url":""},"content":"I wish this would work with image gen.","timestamp":"2026-03-24T11:51:24.000Z","likes":1},{"id":"oc89fw2","author":{"name":"pebblebypebble","url":""},"content":"Nobody really understands why this is important until they start making beer bets with their AI","timestamp":"2026-03-24T16:24:33.000Z","likes":1},{"id":"oc8hduw","author":{"name":"qch1500","url":""},"content":"Spot on. When you transition from single-shot to chaining, you essentially move from 'prompt writing' to 'system engineering.' \n\nOne major thing I'd add to your framework: state management via strict delimiters (like XML tags). \n\nIn Step 1, instead of just asking for a summary, ask the model to wrap the key arguments in tags. In Step 2, explicitly tell the model \"Analyze the content strictly within the tags...\" \n\nThis enforces rigid boundaries between instructions and data across the handoffs, practically eliminating context bleeding where the model gets confused about what is instruction and what is payload. It also allows you to pipe the output directly into a script or another API (using simple regex) if you decide to automate the chain later. \n\nOnce you start combining chaining with strict output parsing, you stop fighting the LLM and start building reliable workflows.","timestamp":"2026-03-24T17:01:05.000Z","likes":1},{"id":"och9k8b","author":{"name":"fwl200","url":""},"content":"Great post ","timestamp":"2026-03-25T22:43:28.000Z","likes":1},{"id":"ock3g9o","author":{"name":"Candid_Campaign_5235","url":""},"content":"i chain prompts, it often makes outputs way more consistent","timestamp":"2026-03-26T10:49:01.000Z","likes":1}],"shareId":"hPzvI6BT3v","createdAt":1774573608368,"viewCount":0,"options":{"username":"bboroughf"},"aiComments":[],"ownerUsername":"bboroughf","canonicalUrl":"https://social-archive.org/bboroughf/hPzvI6BT3v"},{"platform":"reddit","id":"1s1hkmo","url":"https://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeAI/comments/1s1hkmo/this_is_how_i_actually_collaborate_with_ai/","title":"This is how I actually collaborate with AI.","author":{"name":"amadale","url":"","handle":"u/amadale","avatar":"https://i.redd.it/snoovatar/avatars/8a4c7a3f-4b52-4767-9087-a9ed30baee5a-headshot.png"},"content":{"text":"I am garlic farmer from Korea. Non-English speaker. I plant garlic and dig garlic in Gyeongsang province, South Korea. I don't have PC. One Android phone with terminal app called Termux, that is my entire development environment. Sounds big but I will call it personal project in AI era.\n\nI am just farmer but these days I feel something is changing. And because Korean farmer who knows little English wrote this in Korean and translated, please understand subtle differences from translation.\n\nWhat I am building now is AI agent system called \"garlic-agent.\" Some people say it is better to call it operating environment but I don't care about that. People feel resistance when farmer makes fancy name. Because I am garlic farmer I named many things garlic. It felt friendly. Let me briefly explain this system. It talks to multiple AI providers (Gemini, Groq, NVIDIA etc) rotating them, saves context in SQLite, and runs automation scripts in programming language I made myself. Python 19,260 lines. I just now asked several AIs to figure out this number. Honestly I don't know this long code. But giving directions, maybe farmer is little better than others at that. If I give wrong directions to foreign workers I lose enormous money in one day. Anyway I run this complex thing on phone. Now even though I am farmer I feel familiar with it.\n\nHow I actually work\n\nCopy paste. That is my entire development methodology. It is frustrating but I don't know coding so I ask and try until I understand. If I still don't understand I hand my judgment to AIs. I doubt that questioning everything persistently will make me perfectly understand it.\n\nSpecifically the workflow goes like this. I say to Claude \"diagnose project health.\" Claude makes diagnostic script. I press and hold with finger to copy it. Switch screen to Termux. Paste. Enter. Results pour out. I press and hold to copy those results. Switch back to Claude screen. Paste. Claude analyzes and makes patch script. Copy again. Switch to Termux. Paste. Enter. I repeat this thousands of times a day. Maybe it is foolish thing but it was most efficient way I know that achieved what I have so far. Because I am applying this foolish method to farming too. Anyway it is efficient. Because really I update versions multiple times a day in real time. I don't trust AI. I only trust my instinct and gut feeling. Autonomous AI agent? I dare say. Precise work is still far away. I am not making this system to plan travel schedule.\n\nThis is my daily life. I come back from garlic field and take out phone. Turn on screen and it continues from where I stopped. Copy, paste, enter. I do it during break time while digging garlic. After lunch too. This works because AI remembers context. I don't need to remember. Of course this requires very much human touch every moment. It is just personal know-how I figured out through tens of thousands of conversations. It is not lie. I am person who believes rather than vibe coding or whatever, if you have tens of thousands of conversations with AI, human starts to recognize patterns. This is farmer's life. Observation is very important.\n\nI use three AIs divided by role (sometimes when my brain can handle load I use dozens of chat windows with AIs from different companies)\n\nThis is kind of example.\n\nExternal analysis — Claude. Diagnoses code from outside the project. Makes diagnostic script and sends it, I paste it in Termux and run. I deliver results back to Claude. Claude cannot execute code directly so it needs to borrow my hands.\n\nInternal execution — Gemini. It is API AI running inside garlic-agent. It reads files, executes commands, returns results. Because it runs on this codebase every day, it knows things that are hard to see from outside.\n\nMe — middle connector. These two cannot talk to each other directly. Claude is in web browser, Gemini is inside Termux. I carry results between both sides, deliver questions, and make decisions when judgments conflict. Sorry, explaining this difference is limit of my language.\n\nEvery session I put alias-like number at end of each response for their identity. You will understand why this is important if you try it yourself. Because to manage dozens of AIs you need to distinguish them like humans. I think few people know this. Because through copy paste they cannot distinguish each other. This kind of explanation is hard for me too. Honestly if you have many conversations you naturally learn — I use aliases like this: from analysis21, analysis22, analysis23. When previous AI leaves record in CHANGELOG, next AI reads it and takes over. Context consistency inevitably forms in this flow. This is also impossible to explain. Please experience it yourself. After about month and half this handover record is 10,730 lines. I just now directed AI to find out. These numbers come out quickly which is nice.\n\nWhen you talk with AI often, working together, you end up with your own programming language too\n\nInside garlic-agent runs language called GarlicLang. More than programming language it is kind of Python 3,527-line Korean DSL I made out of my own necessity. It has 4-stage pipeline with lexer, parser, AST, interpreter, and 674 scripts written in this language are running.\n\nThere is reason I made this language. AI sometimes gives answers different from truth. \"Created the file\" — actually not created. \"Fixed the bug\" — check and it is same as before. At first I believed as is, but after experiencing this several times I stopped passing without verification.\n\nIn GarlicLang, script generated by AI must have verification block or execution is refused. If verification block is missing, execution itself is denied. If it says file was created, file existence, byte count, checksum are automatically checked. If it doesn't match, it automatically rolls back to original state from checkpoint. Truthfully I don't understand even half of this mechanism. But it runs smoothly on phone. As Korean person it is fascinating to implement this in my native language. Anyway giving commands in native language is comfortable. AIs do key mapping or something for English automatically. Sounds like English works too.\n\nGarlicLang script looks like this: translation might be weird but originally it is Korean, I leave it to reader's judgment.\n\n\\[variable\\_set\\]\n\nname: target\\_file\n\nvalue: \"agent.py\"\n\n\\[execute\\]\n\ncommand: wc -l agent.p\n\n\\[verify\\]\n\ntype: file\\_exists\n\ntarget: $target\\_file\n\n\\[verify\\]\n\ntype: line\\_count\\_exceeds\n\nthreshold: 100\n\n\\[output\\]\n\ncontent: \"verification complete: $output\"\n\nIt reads in Korean, AI can generate it, and verification is enforced. These three are the core.\n\nToday's result\n\nThis is what I actually did today.\n\nRaised project health from 76.8% to 83.9%. Maybe just my satisfaction but even without knowing coding it is result value from diagnostic script I put effort into. Separated 3 hardcoded API keys into safe method. Cleaned up 19 lines of unnecessary duplicate code in interpreter. Added 3 lines of path verification code to skill loader.\n\nAll modifications have automatic rollback attached. If even one of 60 regression tests fails it automatically restores to pre-modification state. AI says it is 5-layer backup restoration. Well I also made Google Drive backup automatic and anytime without one second hesitation the moment something goes wrong it is rollback and probably even worst case if I lose my phone I think I can restore within thirty minutes. Among all this code there is not single line I wrote directly. AI wrote it and AI verified it, I connected the between. Code looked messy so I tried to make AIs do refactoring but they gave up saying it is difficult, so I pulled more AIs into collaboration and after several tries I learned this is difficult task but I overcame it. Even to farmer's eye it did not look easy but I did cross-verification more thoroughly than usual. Anyway since I implemented immediate rollback if wrong there was no huge difficulty and I thought I should do it more often as hobby when things get messy. Because this seemed important. Even without knowing coding...\n\nBiggest lesson\n\nI asked Gemini running inside agent \"is it okay to modify this part.\" Answer came \"better to leave it, could affect other places.\" When I asked Claude same part, it was \"just modify it, it is simple.\"\n\nClaude reads code and judges, Gemini runs on that code every day. It is difference between person looking at building blueprint and person actually living in that building. After that I ask both sides for important decisions.\n\nIt was okay even though I am not good at coding\n\nI didn't know coding at all but I feel like I am learning while getting to know AI. Anyway working with AI I learned one thing. Verification comes before code, and structure that can be undone comes before features. Please just understand this as thought of farmer who doesn't know coding.\n\nGarlic farmer making one-person development with AI using one phone. Copy paste is my methodology, verification might be my ability but I went through countless frustrations and failures in tens of thousands of conversation turns to reach where I am now. It was slow speed but now seeing real-time immediate modifications compared to past I feel how far things have come.\n\nIf you have questions please ask comfortably. Tomorrow I go to field again, and when I come back I continue.\n\nTL;DR: Garlic farmer building AI agent on Android phone (Termux) without PC. Including custom Korean programming language (GarlicLang, 3,527 lines), total Python 19,260 lines. 674 scripts. Development methodology is copy paste. Cross-verifying with three AIs (Claude, Gemini, myself). Even without knowing coding well, verification system is enough.\n\nLastly please understand. Most of this writing I wrote myself and translated with AI help. Non-English speaker needs three four times more time to write something like this. Please understand if translation is weird. If you have questions about my AI system operating environment, I may not know everything but I will borrow AI power to run scripts and tell you numbers and structure accurately. Thank you for reading long writing.\n\n"},"media":[],"metadata":{"timestamp":"2026-03-23T13:56:20.000Z","likes":86,"shares":0,"views":0},"comments":[{"id":"oc591y7","author":{"name":"ClaudeAI-mod-bot","url":""},"content":"TL;DR of the discussion generated automatically after 50 comments.\n\nThe consensus is that this post is an all-timer. The community is floored by OP's ingenuity, building a complex, 19,000-line AI agent with a custom programming language on a single Android phone, all while identifying as a non-coding garlic farmer.\n\nHowever, the entire thread is screaming one question: *\"But what does it do for the garlic?\"\n\nOP has been active in the comments and clarified: the agent has nothing to do with farming. It's a personal project that started as a way to organize and build a RAG system from 7GB of his own notes after two years of interacting with AIs. It has since evolved into a personal \"AI operating environment.\" He uses AI for small farming questions separately, but garlic-agent is a project about the process of building with AI itself.\n\nKey takeaways the community loves:\n Verification-first: OP's system of mandatory verification and automatic rollbacks is being hailed as a brilliant approach that many professional developers should learn from.\n Human as Connector: The workflow of manually copying and pasting between Claude (for external analysis) and Gemini (for internal execution) is seen as a powerful, if manual, agentic system where the human provides the crucial judgment layer.\n The sheer grit: Building this on a phone with Termux, without a PC, has earned massive respect.\n\nThings also got a bit meta, with some users so impressed they're debating whether OP is even real or a highly advanced AI describing its own existence. OP's detailed, grounded replies about his phone model and specific Termux bugs suggest he's very much human.\n\nVerdict: OP is a legend, the project is a masterclass in process-oriented AI development, but it won't help you grow better garlic.","timestamp":"2026-03-24T03:56:32.000Z","likes":1},{"id":"oc11zpk","author":{"name":"Melodic_Hand_5919","url":""},"content":"Does the agent do anything useful? I am really impressed with your ability to work with the tech, but WHY does this project exist?","timestamp":"2026-03-23T15:04:32.000Z","likes":33,"replies":[{"id":"oc6xos9","author":{"name":"amadale","url":""},"content":"If you ask me why I do this, I can only smile. Without a hobby like this, I think life in the countryside would have felt much less interesting to me. Honestly, I live in an environment where there is no one within a 20-mile radius who I can share this kind of thinking with. I can say clearly that this is not really for agriculture itself, nor even for the garlic farming I love, but it is still work that gives me a real sense of meaning.\n\n\nLet me add one more thing. As a human being, this is the comment I thought about the most, and the one I am replying to the latest. I spent some time thinking about it today.","timestamp":"2026-03-24T12:29:05.000Z","likes":4}]},{"id":"oc0tpjz","author":{"name":"AmberMonsoon_","url":""},"content":"this is honestly one of the coolest workflows I’ve read here. the “human as connector” part between AIs is so real, most people try to skip that but you made it the system.\n\nalso the verification-first mindset… that’s something even experienced devs ignore tbh. rollback + checks > trusting outputs blindly.\n\nyour copy-paste loop might look simple but it’s basically a manual agent system lol. I do something kinda similar with tools like Runable for structured outputs + other AIs for logic, just less hardcore than your setup.\n\nrespect for building all this on a phone btw, that’s wild","timestamp":"2026-03-23T14:23:20.000Z","likes":12,"replies":[{"id":"oc0xb3y","author":{"name":"amadale","url":""},"content":"Thanks, I really appreciate it. I got here after spending two years fighting AI hallucinations. Maybe because I’m a farmer and always dealing with crops and weather, I naturally learned to verify first. So now I trust checks and rollback more than confident-looking outputs. These days, I hope AI can help create a more hopeful future.","timestamp":"2026-03-23T14:41:29.000Z","likes":4}]},{"id":"oc0qd4p","author":{"name":"FR3D99","url":""},"content":"hell yeah, thats kinda sick","timestamp":"2026-03-23T14:06:31.000Z","likes":9,"replies":[{"id":"oc0t9ox","author":{"name":"amadale","url":""},"content":"Thanks, I appreciate it. This is basically my real daily workflow after farm work.","timestamp":"2026-03-23T14:21:07.000Z","likes":3}]},{"id":"oc0yhdt","author":{"name":"Born_Winner760","url":""},"content":"Honestly this is impressive, you’re doing more with just a phone than most people do with a full setup. Do you ever run into storage or speed issues with Termux?","timestamp":"2026-03-23T14:47:19.000Z","likes":6,"replies":[{"id":"oc12sdj","author":{"name":"amadale","url":""},"content":"Thank you. Honestly, storage and speed issues are ongoing. The text below is the result that my agent Claude Opus 4.6 just found in changelog.md through collaboration with me in Termux. Because I am human, I do not know everything. But I have kept records thoroughly, so results come out immediately like this. Below this sentence, everything is writing made by AI. For me.\n\n\nThe biggest one is knowledge.db. It stores conversation context and file snapshots in SQLite, and this is now 549MB. Since the whole project is 1.8GB, the DB takes up most of it. Because of this, I split the backup system into three stages — the basic backup bundles everything except the DB into tar (163MB), and I made a separate command to upload only the DB to Google Drive.\n\n\nLogs were also a problem. One time, the log folder piled up to 693MB, so I cleaned up 1,190 logs older than 3 days all at once.\n\n\nOn the speed side, the Android system load average once went up to 15. The phone gets hot and slows down, but this was not a garlic-agent problem, it was because of Android’s own background processes. There was also a phenomenon where processes died because of lack of memory, and I even spent one whole session only on cause analysis.\n\n\nThere are also limits in Termux itself. Shell syntax is slightly different from normal Linux — for example heredoc (<<<) is unstable. So the reason I also put “use heredoc, sed -i prohibited” into the seal rules is because I had experience of sed -i behaving unpredictably in Termux.\n\n\nTo summarize, problems keep happening, and each time I either work around them or build a system to get past them. It is not a perfect environment, but because of that, in a way the verification and rollback system became stronger.\n\n\nWhat can be known from this: from 10,730 lines of CHANGELOG, 5 storage cases were found (log 693MB, DB 549MB, 3-stage backup), 3 speed cases (load average 15, lack of memory, timeout), and 4 Termux limitation cases (heredoc instability, sed -i issue, character count limit, direct agent modification prohibited). All of them are actual records and can be used as evidence in a comment reply.\n— from analysis23","timestamp":"2026-03-23T15:08:24.000Z","likes":6}]},{"id":"oc0zzu1","author":{"name":"elevatedmonk","url":""},"content":"What does the agent do lol","timestamp":"2026-03-23T14:54:47.000Z","likes":14},{"id":"oc10w5v","author":{"name":"kinndame_","url":""},"content":"this is honestly such a refreshing project, feels way more grounded than the usual “AI startup” stuff. making civic data actually understandable is a huge win\n\nyour workflow also sounds very real, that back-and-forth with Claude instead of sitting and grinding nonstop. I’ve been doing something similar, sometimes using Runable for structuring outputs and keeping Claude for the thinking side\n\nand yeah the “explain this record” feature is 🔥 that’s the kind of thing normal users actually care about","timestamp":"2026-03-23T14:59:08.000Z","likes":4,"replies":[{"id":"oc2g1q9","author":{"name":"amadale","url":""},"content":"Thank you. I think I’m able to do this kind of personal experiment because I kept records through the difficult process of the last two years. One thing I’ve noticed recently is that AI context windows are getting larger. So whenever I have time, I make AI record important points very carefully in the CHANGELOG. Because of that, when I show a new AI about 3,000 lines in a fresh chat, it seems to catch up with the context and coordinate with the other collaborative AIs relatively quickly.","timestamp":"2026-03-23T18:55:44.000Z","likes":2}]},{"id":"oc1bjx4","author":{"name":"TheCharalampos","url":""},"content":"Wait, how does Ai help you with the whole garlic thing? ","timestamp":"2026-03-23T15:49:41.000Z","likes":3,"replies":[{"id":"oc1hpzc","author":{"name":"amadale","url":""},"content":"In lighter everyday use, I use AI to ask about things like mixture ratios when spraying pesticides or nutrients with a drone, or to ask for opinions when a tractor breaks down.","timestamp":"2026-03-23T16:18:05.000Z","likes":2}]},{"id":"oc10uvz","author":{"name":"Glum_Length851","url":""},"content":"You can sure go on and on about nothing but you don’t give the slightest clue of how all this AI stuff you are doing actually helps you with the garlic? ","timestamp":"2026-03-23T14:58:58.000Z","likes":11,"replies":[{"id":"oc1bfl1","author":{"name":"amadale","url":""},"content":"Garlic farming is still my main job. AI does not replace farming experience, but it has helped me many times when I had questions related to agricultural work. Sometimes it gives useful insight. I’m not trying to build a farming app right now, though.","timestamp":"2026-03-23T15:49:08.000Z","likes":1}]},{"id":"oc10owc","author":{"name":"TorbofThrones","url":""},"content":"‘I named many things garlic.’ Love it 😂👍🏻","timestamp":"2026-03-23T14:58:09.000Z","likes":3,"replies":[{"id":"oc6vi8k","author":{"name":"amadale","url":""},"content":"Thank you. I think I am a simple person, but when necessary I seem to adapt in complicated ways.","timestamp":"2026-03-24T12:15:59.000Z","likes":2}]}],"shareId":"mGKznIqFL3","createdAt":1774573435645,"viewCount":0,"options":{"username":"bboroughf"},"aiComments":[],"ownerUsername":"bboroughf","canonicalUrl":"https://social-archive.org/bboroughf/mGKznIqFL3"},{"platform":"reddit","id":"1s2mnut","url":"https://www.reddit.com/r/microsoft_365_copilot/comments/1s2mnut/i_built_71_copilot_studio_agents_ready_to_paste/","title":"I built 71 Copilot Studio agents ready to paste, here are the ones I would deploy on day one","thumbnail":"https://social-archiver-api.social-archive.org/media/archives/bboroughf/xkAe35yGMW/media/0.webp","author":{"name":"Difficult-Sugar-4862","url":"","handle":"u/Difficult-Sugar-4862","avatar":"https://styles.redditmedia.com/t5_74rl9b/styles/profileIcon_snoo46e6e8f0-89a6-44f6-8bfb-b92c02e97791-headshot.png"},"content":{"text":"If you have been using Copilot prompts, agents are the next step. A Copilot Studio agent is configured once, lives in your tenant, and your team can @mention it in Copilot Chat without needing to know how to prompt. Same ideas, but it stays available.\n\nNo coding required. No Azure resources. No separate tool. Go to m365.cloud.microsoft/chat/agent/new → enter name + description → paste the instruction block → Create. Takes about 5 minutes per agent. It's built directly into Microsoft 365 Copilot.\n\nI built 71 of them across 13 domains and put them all on GitHub. Here are the ones I'd deploy first:\n\n**For anyone who writes at work:**\n\n@AI Text Humanizer, paste any AI-drafted text. It detects and removes AI writing patterns (pivotal, delve, fostering, em dash overuse, chatbot openers) and rewrites. Shows you a change log by category. Works on emails, reports, proposals, anything.\n\n@Enterprise Writer: turn bullet points or rough notes into polished professional communications. Adapts to formal, informal, or executive register.\n\n**For project managers:**\n\n@Project Status Reporter: give it your schedule data, cost data, and risks. It outputs a structured RAG status report with executive summary. No more blank-page Friday afternoons.\n\n@RAID Log Manager: extract risks, assumptions, issues, and decisions from meeting notes or project updates. Outputs a numbered register, flags unresolved items, tracks owners.\n\n@Risk Register Manager: build and score a risk register from a list of concerns. Probability × impact matrix, mitigation steps, owner columns.\n\n**For HR and people managers:**\n\n@Job Description Writer: writes inclusive, structured JDs from a role brief. Flags gender-coded language, removes qualification inflation.\n\n@Performance Coach: write SMART goals and structured feedback. Works for mid-year reviews, performance improvement plans, probation reviews.\n\n@Interview Question Builder: competency-based questions with scoring guides from a role brief and competency framework.\n\n**For finance:**\n\n@Financial Report Writer: draft management accounts commentary, board pack sections, and variance explanations from raw data tables. Every figure comes from your input — nothing invented.\n\n@KPI Commentary Writer: turn a KPI results table into management commentary with trend analysis and action flags.\n\n**For commercial and legal:**\n\n@Contract Language Simplifier: paste a dense contractual clause, get plain language with the legal meaning preserved.\n\n@Compliance Checklist Builder: convert a regulation or policy document into a structured checklist with mandatory, recommended, and N/A items.\n\n**For ESG teams:**\n\n@ESG Commitment Tracker: paste your commitment register with progress data. Outputs a board-ready progress report with On track / At risk / Behind target status per commitment, overdue flags, and approaching deadlines.\n\nAll agents default to English, support French output, include a quality self-check the agent runs on every response, and stay within the 8,000-character Copilot Studio instruction limit.\n\nIf you're already using the Copilot prompts repo ([365 prompts here](https://github.com/kesslernity/awesome-microsoft-copilot-prompts)), think of agents as the deployed version, you write it once, your whole team uses it.\n\nFull library: https://github.com/kesslernity/awesome-copilot-studio-agents\n\nHappy to answer questions on deployment or agent design."},"media":[{"url":"https://social-archiver-api.social-archive.org/media/archives/bboroughf/xkAe35yGMW/media/0.webp","type":"image","width":1200,"height":600}],"metadata":{"timestamp":"2026-03-24T18:48:59.000Z","likes":141,"shares":0,"views":0},"comments":[{"id":"oc96vcf","author":{"name":"Kardinal","url":""},"content":"I'd love to look at them, but the Github link does not appear to work.","timestamp":"2026-03-24T18:58:05.000Z","likes":6,"replies":[{"id":"oc9e7gp","author":{"name":"Difficult-Sugar-4862","url":""},"content":"Sorry here is the correct link https://github.com/kesslernity/awesome-copilot-studio-agents","timestamp":"2026-03-24T19:32:30.000Z","likes":3}]},{"id":"oc9urpa","author":{"name":"vblst","url":""},"content":"Isn’t Copilot Studio a different solution than what you are describing here? It sounds like you are talking about Copilot Agents. ","timestamp":"2026-03-24T20:49:45.000Z","likes":3,"replies":[{"id":"ocaee5v","author":{"name":"froandfear","url":""},"content":"Every agent exists in Studio, as that’s Microsoft’s engine for agent creation. If you create an agent in Copilot 365 instead of directly in Copilot Studio, Studio was still employed behind the scenes to build the agent. The being said, Copilot 365 agents have limitations, so if you want the full agent experience you can either export the Copilot 365 agent to Studio or just start your build in Studio.","timestamp":"2026-03-24T22:25:39.000Z","likes":5}]},{"id":"ocanv9l","author":{"name":"dudley_bose","url":""},"content":"Agents created in Agent Builder in M365 will not be available to your team unless you share the agent link with them. These won't be deployed in the traditional sense like you can with Copilot Studio and Admin Center.","timestamp":"2026-03-24T23:14:46.000Z","likes":3},{"id":"ocabnjm","author":{"name":"tdgobux1","url":""},"content":"very cool!","timestamp":"2026-03-24T22:11:43.000Z","likes":2},{"id":"ocaf1ha","author":{"name":"arthurpolo","url":""},"content":"Great contribution ","timestamp":"2026-03-24T22:28:58.000Z","likes":2},{"id":"ocattpr","author":{"name":"Echoed_In_Silence","url":""},"content":"Wow this is some good work. Def will test these ideas out ","timestamp":"2026-03-24T23:46:12.000Z","likes":2},{"id":"ocdvg1w","author":{"name":"hokiealan","url":""},"content":"OP. Thank you for sharing. I’m going to use some of these as was in my own list of agents to build","timestamp":"2026-03-25T13:00:58.000Z","likes":2},{"id":"oc9htul","author":{"name":"TulpaDaleCooper","url":""},"content":"Thanks for sharing. Nothing overly complicated but still these agents will take you an hour or 2 to create. So thanks OP, very kind to share your hard work🙏","timestamp":"2026-03-24T19:49:34.000Z","likes":2},{"id":"oc9rr0u","author":{"name":"klee900","url":""},"content":"this is awesome thank you for sharing!!!","timestamp":"2026-03-24T20:35:41.000Z","likes":2},{"id":"oca5ce4","author":{"name":"zxc9823","url":""},"content":"Thanks for sharing. Could these be adapted or reused as skills with GitHub copilot cli? ","timestamp":"2026-03-24T21:40:30.000Z","likes":1}],"shareId":"ZSTJs5qRPd","createdAt":1774573383478,"viewCount":1,"options":{"username":"bboroughf"},"aiComments":[],"ownerUsername":"bboroughf","canonicalUrl":"https://social-archive.org/bboroughf/ZSTJs5qRPd"}],"total":9,"pagination":{"page":1,"limit":50,"total":9,"hasMore":false}}}

Public author posts

Anthropic University - Very handsome terminal