AI is doing the work. Your expertise is going unused.
Not because you're lazy. Because nobody told you where to put it.
Most professionals using AI right now are focused on one thing: getting output faster.
First draft. Done. Research summary. Done. Stakeholder email. Done.
And the output is... fine. Competent. Nothing obviously wrong.
So they hit send.
That's where the problem lives.
"Fine" isn't what 20 years of experience produces. "Fine" is what AI produces.
The gap between "fine" and "exactly right for this situation" — the read on the room, the political nuance, the thing the data doesn't show — that's your professional value. And if you're not putting it in, you're not working smarter. You're just working faster.
Here's what that costs over time: the judgment atrophies.
A Fortune survey of C-suite executives (link in the first comment) flagged exactly this — leaders aren't afraid AI will replace their senior people. They're afraid those people will stop exercising the judgment that made them senior in the first place.
So here's something concrete you can do today.
Before you finalize any AI output, ask yourself one question:
"What does this draft not know that I know?"
Then add it.
That's the 30%. Not a full rewrite. Not hours of editing. One deliberate expert intervention which is the thing only you can put in.
AI gets you 70% of the way there. Your expertise gets you to 100%.
What do you add to AI output that it could never generate on its own?
I think we forget that sometimes our goal was 90% because of many reasons (eg time, priorities, etc), so if we're getting to 100% now, that's amazing! Apr 17 1 like